| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:10:37 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net/page_pool: Fix inconsistent lock state warning
Fix the warning below by calling the ptr_ring_consume_bh,
which uses spin_[un]lock_bh.
[ 179.064300] ================================
[ 179.069073] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[ 179.073846] 4.18.0-rc2+ #18 Not tainted
[ 179.078133] --------------------------------
[ 179.082907] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[ 179.089637] swapper/21/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[ 179.095478] 00000000963d1995 (&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at:
__page_pool_empty_ring+0x61/0x100
[ 179.105988] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[ 179.111443] _raw_spin_lock+0x35/0x50
[ 179.115634] __page_pool_empty_ring+0x61/0x100
[ 179.120699] page_pool_destroy+0x32/0x50
[ 179.125204] mlx5e_free_rq+0x38/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.130471] mlx5e_close_channel+0x20/0x120 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.136418] mlx5e_close_channels+0x26/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.142364] mlx5e_close_locked+0x44/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.148509] mlx5e_close+0x42/0x60 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.153936] __dev_close_many+0xb1/0x120
[ 179.158749] dev_close_many+0xa2/0x170
[ 179.163364] rollback_registered_many+0x148/0x460
[ 179.169047] rollback_registered+0x56/0x90
[ 179.174043] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x7e/0x100
[ 179.179816] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20
[ 179.184623] mlx5e_remove+0x2a/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.190107] mlx5_remove_device+0xe5/0x110 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.196274] mlx5_unregister_interface+0x39/0x90 [mlx5_core]
[ 179.203028] cleanup+0x5/0xbfc [mlx5_core]
[ 179.208031] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x16b/0x240
[ 179.213640] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x210
[ 179.218151] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 179.224218] irq event stamp: 334398
[ 179.228438] hardirqs last enabled at (334398): [<ffffffffa511d8b7>]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x1c7/0x790
[ 179.239178] hardirqs last disabled at (334397): [<ffffffffa511d872>]
rcu_process_callbacks+0x182/0x790
[ 179.249931] softirqs last enabled at (334386): [<ffffffffa509732e>] irq_enter+0x5e/0x70
[ 179.259306] softirqs last disabled at (334387): [<ffffffffa509741c>] irq_exit+0xdc/0xf0
[ 179.268584]
[ 179.268584] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 179.276572] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 179.276572]
[ 179.283877] CPU0
[ 179.286954] ----
[ 179.290033] lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock);
[ 179.295546] <Interrupt>
[ 179.298830] lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock);
[ 179.304550]
[ 179.304550] *** DEADLOCK ***
Fixes: ff7d6b27f894 ("page_pool: refurbish version of page_pool code")
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
---
net/core/page_pool.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 68bf07206744..43a932cb609b 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void __page_pool_empty_ring(struct page_pool *pool)
struct page *page;
/* Empty recycle ring */
- while ((page = ptr_ring_consume(&pool->ring))) {
+ while ((page = ptr_ring_consume_bh(&pool->ring))) {
/* Verify the refcnt invariant of cached pages */
if (!(page_ref_count(page) == 1))
pr_crit("%s() page_pool refcnt %d violation\n",
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists