netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: Support Wake-on-LAN using filters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:51:49 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: Support Wake-on-LAN using filters

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:28:52AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/17/2018 09:21 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>>> ethtool -s gphy wol f filters 0x2
> >>>
> >>> What does this 0x2 represent?
> >>
> >> 0x2 = bit 1 is set, which corresponds to the filter ID that was returned
> >> from the previous ethtool::rxnfc command invocation. If ethtool
> >> --config-nfc returned 3, then we would have used filters 0x8, etc.
> > 
> > It would be a simpler for the user if you could pass the filter IDs as
> > a list, and let ethtool do the shift and OR.
> 
> Sure, I can definitively add that, is a comma separator okay with you
> for that? E.g:
> 
> ethtool -s gphy wol f filters 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Hi Florian

That looks good. But maybe check the man page for ethtool and see if
there is an established convention.

      Andrew