| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 16:29:30 -0400
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, luto@...nel.org,
carlos@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
simo@...hat.com, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak90 (was ghak32) V3 02/10] audit: log container
info of syscalls
On 2018-07-20 18:13, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:00 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Create a new audit record AUDIT_CONTAINER to document the audit
> > container identifier of a process if it is present.
> >
> > Called from audit_log_exit(), syscalls are covered.
> >
> > A sample raw event:
> > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=yes exit=3 a0=ffffff9c a1=56374e1cef30 a2=241 a3=1b6 items=2 ppid=606 pid=635 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=pts0 ses=3 comm="bash" exe="/usr/bin/bash" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key="tmpcontainerid"
> > type=CWD msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): cwd="/root"
> > type=PATH msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): item=0 name="/tmp/" inode=13863 dev=00:27 mode=041777 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 nametype= PARENT cap_fp=0000000000000000 cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> > type=PATH msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): item=1 name="/tmp/tmpcontainerid" inode=17729 dev=00:27 mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 nametype=CREATE cap_fp=0000000000000000 cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0
> > type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): proctitle=62617368002D6300736C65657020313B206563686F2074657374203E202F746D702F746D70636F6E7461696E65726964
> > type=CONTAINER msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): op=task contid=123458
> >
> > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/90
> > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/issues/51
> > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/64
> > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Container-ID
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/audit.h | 7 +++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> > kernel/audit.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/auditsc.c | 3 +++
> > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@
> > #define AUDIT_REPLACE 1329 /* Replace auditd if this packet unanswerd */
> > #define AUDIT_KERN_MODULE 1330 /* Kernel Module events */
> > #define AUDIT_FANOTIFY 1331 /* Fanotify access decision */
> > +#define AUDIT_CONTAINER 1332 /* Container ID */
>
> I'm not sure I'm completely sold on the AUDIT_CONTAINER_ID and
> AUDIT_CONTAINER record type names. From what I can tell
> AUDIT_CONTAINER_ID seems to be used for audit container ID management
> operations, e.g. setting the ID, whereas the AUDIT_CONTAINER is used
> to tag events with the corresponding audit container ID. Assuming
> that is correct, it seems like AUDIT_CONTAINER might be better served
> if it was named AUDIT_CONTAINER_ID and if we could change
> AUDIT_CONTAINER_ID to AUDIT_CONTAINER_OP/MGMT/etc. Thoughts?
Please see discussion at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2018-May/msg00101.html
I'm fine with changing AUDIT_CONTAINER_ID to AUDIT_CONTAINER_OP/MGMT/etc.
> > #define AUDIT_AVC 1400 /* SE Linux avc denial or grant */
> > #define AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR 1401 /* Internal SE Linux Errors */
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > index e7478cb..5e150c6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > @@ -2048,6 +2048,29 @@ void audit_log_session_info(struct audit_buffer *ab)
> > audit_log_format(ab, " auid=%u ses=%u", auid, sessionid);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * audit_log_contid - report container info
> > + * @tsk: task to be recorded
> > + * @context: task or local context for record
> > + * @op: contid string description
> > + */
> > +int audit_log_contid(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > + struct audit_context *context, char *op)
> > +{
> > + struct audit_buffer *ab;
> > +
> > + if (!audit_contid_set(tsk))
> > + return 0;
> > + /* Generate AUDIT_CONTAINER record with container ID */
> > + ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONTAINER);
> > + if (!ab)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + audit_log_format(ab, "op=%s contid=%llu",
> > + op, audit_get_contid(tsk));
>
> Can you explain your reason for including an "op" field in this record
> type? I've been looking at the rest of the patches in this patchset
> and it seems to be used more as an indicator of the record's
> generating context rather than any sort of audit container ID
> operation.
"action" might work, but that's netfilter and numeric... "kind"?
Nothing else really seems to fit from a field name, type or lack of
searchability perspective.
Steve, do you have an opinion?
> > + audit_log_end(ab);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
Powered by blists - more mailing lists