netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/8] Support mlx5 flow steering with RAW data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:35:17 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/8] Support mlx5 flow steering with RAW data

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 08:37:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

> > Also, I would like to keep the specs consistently formatted according
> > to clang-format with 'BinPackParameters: true', so I reflowed them as
> > well.
> 
> I'm using default VIM clang-format.py without anything in .clang-format.
> Do you have an extra definitions there, except BinPackParameters?

These days Linux includes a top level .clang-format that does a
pretty good job.

I have to manually switch BinPackParameters on when working with these
specs to get the right indenting.. A pain, but maybe there is a better
way someday..

Jason