netdev - Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix NULL pointer dereferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:13:59 +0200
From:   Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@...il.com>
To:     Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix NULL pointer dereferences

On 07/26/2018 11:48 AM, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov wrote on Thu, Jul 26, 2018:
>>> Let's refuse that at much higher level, like v9fs_mount() in
>>> fs/9p/vfs_super.c
>>>
>>> I can't think of any valid reason for dev_name to be NULL, it's the
>>> target IP or virtio handle.
>>
>> But I think trans=fd allows NULL addr today, no?
> 

How ?

> Ah, right, I read the patch too fast and read unix_create as fd_create,
> I never realized there was a unix_create variant...
> 
> fd legitimately doesn't need a name, you are correct.
> 
> I'm really curious if anyone ever uses the unix/fd variants for "real"
> stuff though! (not meaning syzbot isn't real, but I have yet to see
> anything take advantage of this, even if I could imagine some fun
> applications by piping the wmii libixp server socket.. and just crashed
> my laptop trying because of the (fixed) trans put bug.. I have yet to
> see anyone actually doing this)
> 
> 
> On the other hand, virtio, rdma and xen all have the same problem, so
> Thomas, please fix them instead :)
> 

So just by patching v9fs_mount ?