netdev - RE: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: Remove VLA usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 08:59:01 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Pavel Machek' <pavel@....cz>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: Remove VLA usage

From: Pavel Machek
> Sent: 29 July 2018 12:40
...
> > > +	unsigned long		*bitmap;
> > > +	unsigned long		_bitmap;
> >
> > This looks rather confusing. _bitmap -> bitmap_data? bitmap_bits?
> 
> Actually, AFAICT that long is not used as a long, but as array of
> bits. So maybe char bitmap_data[8] would be more appropriate?

Unfortunately the 'bitmap' functions are defined to work in a 
specific way on unsigned long[].
This means, for example, that they can't use the x86 'bit' instructions.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)