netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a typo in map in map test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Aug 2018 15:47:10 -0700
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Arthur Fabre <afabre@...udflare.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix a typo in map in map test

Commit fbeb1603bf4e ("bpf: verifier: MOV64 don't mark dst reg unbounded")
revealed a typo in commit fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map"):
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0) was used instead of
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0).

I've noticed the problem by running bpf kselftests.

Fixes: fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map")
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Arthur Fabre <afabre@...udflare.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 4b5e03c25204..ac281ee771dd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -7113,7 +7113,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
 				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.fixup_map_in_map = { 3 },
@@ -7136,7 +7136,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8),
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
 				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.fixup_map_in_map = { 3 },
@@ -7158,7 +7158,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
 			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
 				     BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
-			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
 		.fixup_map_in_map = { 3 },
-- 
2.14.4