lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 07:56:18 -0700
From:   Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>
To:     Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        <aviadye@...lanox.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/1] net/tls: Combined memory allocation for
 decryption request

Hi Vakul,

Only minor comments, mostly looks good to me.  Thanks

> +/* This function decrypts the input skb into either out_iov or in out_sg
> + * or in skb buffers itself. The input parameter 'zc' indicates if
> + * zero-copy mode needs to be tried or not. With zero-copy mode, either
> + * out_iov or out_sg must be non-NULL. In case both out_iov and out_sg are
> + * NULL, then the decryption happens inside skb buffers itself, i.e.
> + * zero-copy gets disabled and 'zc' is updated.
> + */
> +
> +static int decrypt_internal(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> +			    struct iov_iter *out_iov,
> +			    struct scatterlist *out_sg,
> +			    int *chunk, bool *zc)
> +{
> +	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> +	struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
> +	struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> +	int n_sgin, n_sgout, nsg, mem_size, aead_size, err, pages = 0;
> +	struct aead_request *aead_req;
> +	struct sk_buff *unused;
> +	u8 *aad, *iv, *mem = NULL;
> +	struct scatterlist *sgin = NULL;
> +	struct scatterlist *sgout = NULL;
> +	const int data_len = rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.overhead_size;
> +
> +	if (*zc && (out_iov || out_sg)) {
> +		if (out_iov)
> +			n_sgout = iov_iter_npages(out_iov, INT_MAX) + 1;
> +		else if (out_sg)
> +			n_sgout = sg_nents(out_sg);
> +		else
> +			goto no_zerocopy;

Is the last else necessary?  It looks like the if already checks for
out_iov || out_sg.

>  		struct scatterlist *sgout)
>  {
> -	struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> -	struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
> -	char iv[TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE + MAX_IV_SIZE];
> -	struct scatterlist sgin_arr[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2];
> -	struct scatterlist *sgin = &sgin_arr[0];
> -	struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> -	int ret, nsg;
> -	struct sk_buff *unused;
> -
> -	ret = skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset + TLS_HEADER_SIZE,
> -			    iv + TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE,
> -			    tls_ctx->rx.iv_size);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	memcpy(iv, tls_ctx->rx.iv, TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE);
> -	if (!sgout) {
> -		nsg = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &unused);
> -	} else {
> -		nsg = skb_nsg(skb,
> -			      rxm->offset + tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size,
> -			      rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size);
> -		if (nsg <= 0)
> -			return nsg;
> -	}
> -
> -	// We need one extra for ctx->rx_aad_ciphertext
> -	nsg++;
> -
> -	if (nsg > ARRAY_SIZE(sgin_arr))
> -		sgin = kmalloc_array(nsg, sizeof(*sgin), sk->sk_allocation);
> -
> -	if (!sgout)
> -		sgout = sgin;
> -
> -	sg_init_table(sgin, nsg);
> -	sg_set_buf(&sgin[0], ctx->rx_aad_ciphertext, TLS_AAD_SPACE_SIZE);
> -
> -	nsg = skb_to_sgvec(skb, &sgin[1],
> -			   rxm->offset + tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size,
> -			   rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size);
> -	if (nsg < 0) {
> -		ret = nsg;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	tls_make_aad(ctx->rx_aad_ciphertext,
> -		     rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.overhead_size,
> -		     tls_ctx->rx.rec_seq,
> -		     tls_ctx->rx.rec_seq_size,
> -		     ctx->control);
> -
> -	ret = tls_do_decryption(sk, sgin, sgout, iv,
> -				rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.overhead_size,
> -				skb, sk->sk_allocation);
> -
> -out:
> -	if (sgin != &sgin_arr[0])
> -		kfree(sgin);
> +	bool zc = true;
> +	int chunk;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return decrypt_internal(sk, skb, NULL, sgout, &chunk, &zc);
>  }

Can we merge this function to callsites?  It's pretty useless now.

>  
>  static bool tls_sw_advance_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -899,43 +964,17 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (!ctx->decrypted) {
> -			int page_count;
> -			int to_copy;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ