[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 18:56:29 +0300
From: Tal Gilboa <talgi@...lanox.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, keith.busch@...el.com,
alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com, austin_bolen@...l.com,
shyam_iyer@...l.com, Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@...ium.com>,
everest-linux-l2@...ium.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] net/mlx5: Do not call pcie_print_link_status()
On 8/8/2018 6:41 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 05:23:12PM +0300, Tal Gilboa wrote:
>> On 8/8/2018 9:08 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>>>> This is now done by the PCI core to warn of sub-optimal bandwidth.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 4 ----
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
>>>
>>
>> Alex,
>> I loaded mlx5 driver with and without these series. The report in dmesg is
>> now missing. From what I understood, the status should be reported at least
>> once, even if everything is in order.
>
> It is not what this series is doing and it removes prints completely if
> fabric can deliver more than card is capable.
>
>> We need this functionality to stay.
>
> I'm not sure that you need this information in driver's dmesg output,
> but most probably something globally visible and accessible per-pci
> device.
Currently we have users that look for it. If we remove the dmesg print
we need this to be reported elsewhere. Adding it to sysfs for example
should be a valid solution for our case.
>
>>
>> net-next (dmesg output for 07:00.0):
>> [270498.625351] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: firmware version: 14.22.4020
>> [270498.632130] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: 63.008 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth
>> (8 GT/s x8 link)
>> [270499.169533] (0000:07:00.0): E-Switch: Total vports 9, per vport: max
>> uc(1024) max mc(16384)
>> [270499.182358] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: Port module event: module 0, Cable
>> plugged
>>
>> net-next + patches (dmesg output for 07:00.0):
>> [ 331.608472] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: firmware version: 14.22.4020
>> [ 332.564938] (0000:07:00.0): E-Switch: Total vports 9, per vport: max
>> uc(1024) max mc(16384)
>> [ 332.616271] mlx5_core 0000:07:00.0: Port module event: module 0, Cable
>> plugged
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists