netdev - Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [RFC bpf-next PATCH] samples/bpf: xdp1 add XDP hardware offload option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:59:57 +0200
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Nick Viljoen <nick.viljoen@...ronome.com>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, jhsiao@...hat.com,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [RFC bpf-next PATCH] samples/bpf: xdp1 add
 XDP hardware offload option

On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:49:33 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:09:12 +0200
> Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:59:19 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:  
> > > Trying to use XDP hardware offloading via XDP_FLAGS_HW_MODE
> > > and setting the ifindex in prog_load_attr.ifindex before
> > > loading the BPF code via bpf_prog_load_xattr().
> > > 
> > > This unfortunately does not seem to work...
> > > - Am I doing something wrong?
> > > 
> > > Notice, I also disable the map BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY
> > > to make sure it was not related to the map (not supporting
> > > offloading).
> > > 
> > > Failed with:
> > >  # ./xdp1 -O $(</sys/class/net/enp130s0np1/ifindex)
> > >  libbpf: load bpf program failed: Invalid argument
> > >  libbpf: failed to load program 'xdp1'
> > >  libbpf: failed to load object './xdp1_kern.o'
> > > 
> > > Tested on kernel 4.18.0-2.el8.x86_64 with driver nfp
> > >  Ethernet controller: Netronome Systems, Inc. Device 4000    
> > 
> > Are you running the BPF capable FW?
> > 
> > https://help.netronome.com/support/solutions/articles/36000050009-agilio-ebpf-2-0-6-extended-berkeley-packet-filter  
> 
> I'm likely not running the correct firmware...
> 
> Can you tell me, with the ethtool -i output, if I'm running the
> appropriate firmware?
> 
> # ethtool -i enp129s0np1
> driver: nfp
> version: 4.18.0-2.el8.x86_64 SMP mod_unl
> firmware-version: 0.0.3.5 0.21 nic-2.0.7 nic
> expansion-rom-version: 
> bus-info: 0000:81:00.0
> supports-statistics: yes
> supports-test: no
> supports-eeprom-access: no
> supports-register-dump: yes
> supports-priv-flags: no

Yup, the BPF firmware says bpf in firmware version.

> If this is a firmware version case, then we should really improve the
> errors we are giving the user, the -EINVAL can be anything.
> 
>  "libbpf: load bpf program failed: Invalid argument"

That is true.