lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:26:08 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next 2/2] net: dump whole skb data in netdev_rx_csum_fault()

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:17 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:05 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/20/2018 06:13 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > Currently, we only dump a few selected skb fields in
> > > netdev_rx_csum_fault(). It is not suffient for debugging checksum
> > > fault. This patch introduces skb_dump() which dumps skb mac header,
> > > network header and its whole skb->data too.
> > >
> > > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> > > ---
> >
> >
> > > +     print_hex_dump(level, "skb data: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
> > > +                    skb->data, skb->len, false);
> >
> > As I mentioned to David, we want all the bytes that were maybe already pulled
> >
> > (skb->head starting point, not skb->data)
>
> Hmm, with mac header and network header, it is effectively from skb->head, no?
> Is there anything between skb->head and mac header?

Oh, I guess we wanted a single hex dump, or we need some user program
to be able to
rebuild from different memory zones the original CHECKSUM_COMPLETE value.

>
> >
> > Also we will miss the trimmed bytes if there were padding data.
> > And it seems the various bugs we have are all tied to the pulled or trimmed bytes.
> >
>
> Unless I miss something, the tailing padding data should be in range
> [iphdr->tot_len, skb->len]. No?


Not after we did the pskb_trim_rcsum() call, since it has effectively
reduced skb->len by the number of padding bytes.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ