netdev - Re: consistency for statistics with XDP mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:37:30 +0900
From:   Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: consistency for statistics with XDP mode

On 2018/11/23 1:43, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/21/18 5:53 PM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> We really need consistency in the counters and at a minimum, users
>>> should be able to track packet and byte counters for both Rx and Tx
>>> including XDP.
>>>
>>> It seems to me the Rx and Tx packet, byte and dropped counters returned
>>> for the standard device stats (/proc/net/dev, ip -s li show, ...) should
>>> include all packets managed by the driver regardless of whether they are
>>> forwarded / dropped in XDP or go up the Linux stack. This also aligns
>>
>> Agreed. When I introduced virtio_net XDP counters, I just forgot to
>> update tx packets/bytes counters on ndo_xdp_xmit. Probably I thought it
>> is handled by free_old_xmit_skbs.
> 
> Do you have some time to look at adding the Tx counters to virtio_net?

hoping I can make some time within a couple of days.

-- 
Toshiaki Makita