lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:27:59 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "yuehaibing@...wei.com" <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: Remove duplicated include from
 eswitch.c

On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 10:55 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:03:38 +0000
> 
> > Remove duplicated include.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> 
> Saeed, how would you like me to handle small fixes like this which
> have been
> explicitly ACK'd by a Mellanox developer?
> 
> Do you want me to apply them directly or wait to get them from you in
> your
> next pull request?
> 

Let's do the following, if I ACK them then you can apply them directly,
otherwise i will notify and apply them to my branch and send them later
to avoid any confusion or conflict with our shared branch.

Does that work for you ? if not then you can always leave them to me. 

Thanks !

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ