netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3 net-next] net: phy: disregard "Clause 22 registers present" bit in get_phy_c45_devs_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:43:35 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3 net-next] net: phy: disregard "Clause 22
 registers present" bit in get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:34:34 +0100

> On 11.02.2019 22:19, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:19:17 +0100
>> 
>>> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that
>>> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when
>>> populating the device list. If code needs this information it
>>> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device
>>> list.
>>> Because this bit doesn't represent a device don't define a
>>> MDIO_MMD_XYZ constant, just define a MDIO_DEVS_XYZ constant for
>>> the flag in the device list bitmap.
>>  ...
>> 
>> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin.
>> 
> You applied v2 already, and with a follow-up patch I "upgraded"
> it to v3. So you can disregard this series.

Oh that's right, thanks.