[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1550874964-16769-3-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:36:04 +0000
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/2] nfp: bpf: fix ALU32 high bits clearance bug
NFP BPF JIT compiler is doing a couple of small optimizations when jitting
ALU imm instructions, some of these optimizations could save code-gen, for
example:
A & -1 = A
A | 0 = A
A ^ 0 = A
However, for ALU32, high 32-bit of the 64-bit register should still be
cleared according to ISA semantics.
Fixes: cd7df56ed3e6 ("nfp: add BPF to NFP code translator")
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index a096965..0a868c8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -1291,15 +1291,10 @@ wrp_alu64_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta,
static int
wrp_alu32_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta,
- enum alu_op alu_op, bool skip)
+ enum alu_op alu_op)
{
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
- if (skip) {
- meta->skip = true;
- return 0;
- }
-
wrp_alu_imm(nfp_prog, insn->dst_reg * 2, alu_op, insn->imm);
wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1), 0);
@@ -2309,7 +2304,7 @@ static int xor_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int xor_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_XOR, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_XOR);
}
static int and_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2319,7 +2314,7 @@ static int and_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int and_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_AND, !~meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_AND);
}
static int or_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2329,7 +2324,7 @@ static int or_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int or_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_OR, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_OR);
}
static int add_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2339,7 +2334,7 @@ static int add_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int add_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_ADD, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_ADD);
}
static int sub_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2349,7 +2344,7 @@ static int sub_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int sub_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB);
}
static int mul_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists