netdev - Re: [PATCH net v1] net/mlx5e: Correctly use the namespace type when allocating pedit action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:37:01 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "gerlitz.or@...il.com" <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net/mlx5e: Correctly use the namespace type when
 allocating pedit action

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 3:43 AM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 21:02 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 02:05:02PM +0000, Roi Dayan wrote:
> > >
> > > On 26/02/2019 14:28, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
> > > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > The capacity of FDB offloading and NIC offloading table are
> > > > different, and when allocating the pedit actions, we should
> > > > use the correct namespace type.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: c500c86b0c75d ("net/mlx5e: support for two independent
> > > > packet edit actions")
> > > > Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > > > index 3a02b22..467ef9e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
> > > > @@ -2635,7 +2635,7 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct
> > > > mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > > >
> > > >   if (hdrs[TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET].pedits ||
> > > >       hdrs[TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_ADD].pedits) {
> > > > -         err = alloc_tc_pedit_action(priv,
> > > > MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_KERNEL,
> > > > +         err = alloc_tc_pedit_action(priv,
> > > > MLX5_FLOW_NAMESPACE_FDB,
> > > >                                       parse_attr, hdrs, extack);
> > > >           if (err)
> > > >                   return err;
> > > >
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
>
> Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>
> Dave, can you please apply this directly to net-next ?
will be applied to net-next, or net ? this patch is a bugfix.
> Thanks,
> Saeed.