netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: add struct nexthop to fib{6}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 18:04:14 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:     dsahern@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, kafai@...com, weiwan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: add struct nexthop to fib{6}_info



On 5/31/19 2:38 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/31/19 3:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> David, can you add some supplementary information to your cover letter
>> et al.  which seems to be part of what Alexei is asking for and seems
>> quite reasonable?
>>
> 
> It is not clear to me what more is wanted in the cover letter. His
> complaints were on lack of tests. I sent those separately; they really
> aren't tied to this specific set (most of them apply to the previous set
> which provided the uapi and core implementation). This set is mostly
> mechanical in adding wrappers to 2 fields and shoving existing code into
> the else branch of 'if (fi->nh) { new code } else { existing code }'
> 

Hi David

I have a bunch (about 15 ) of syzbot reports, probably caused to your latest patch series.

Do we want to stabilize first, or do you expect this new patch series to fix
these issues ?