netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:18:01 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     jgg@...lanox.com, mst@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
        jglisse@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation


On 2019/9/6 下午9:15, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800
>
>> On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other
>>> patch for next..
>>>
>>> Jason
>> Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle.
> Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'.


Thanks for the reminding. I want the patch to go through Michael's vhost  
tree, that's why I don't put 'net' prefix. For next time, maybe I can  
use "vhost" as a prefix for classification?