netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Attempt to fix regression with AR8035 speed downgrade

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 22 Sep 2019 18:53:35 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        tinywrkb <tinywrkb@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Attempt to fix regression with AR8035 speed downgrade

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:59:32AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> tinywrkb, please can you test this series to ensure that it fixes
> your problem - the previous version has turned out to be a non-starter
> as it introduces more problems, thanks!
> 
> The following series attempts to address an issue spotted by tinywrkb
> with the AR8035 on the Cubox-i2 in a situation where the PHY downgrades
> the negotiated link.

Hi Russell

This all looks sensible.

One things we need to be careful of, is this is for net and so stable.
But only some of the patches have fixes-tags. I don't know if we
should add fixes tags to all the patches, just to give back porters a
hint that they are all needed? It won't compile without the patches,
so at least it fails safe.

   Andrew