lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 23:39:22 +0000
From:   "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To:     "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "jgg@...lanox.com" <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/20] ice: Initialize and register multi-function device
 to provide RDMA

On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 20:05 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:00AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
> > 
> > The RDMA block does not advertise on the PCI bus or any other bus.
> 
> Huh?  How do you "know" where it is then?  Isn't is usually assigned
> to
> a PCI device?

The RDMA block does not have its own PCI function so it must register
and interact with the ice driver.  

> 
> > Thus the ice driver needs to provide access to the RDMA hardware
> > block
> > via a virtual bus; utilize a multi-function device to provide this
> > access.
> > 
> > This patch initializes the driver to support RDMA as well as
> > creates
> > and registers a multi-function device for the RDMA driver to
> > register to.
> > At this point the driver is fully initialized to register a
> > platform
> > driver, however, can not yet register as the ops have not been
> > implemented.
> > 
> > We refer to the interaction of this platform device as Inter-Driver
> > Communication (IDC); where the platform device is referred to as
> > the peer
> > device and the platform driver is referred to as the peer driver.
> 
> Again, no platform devices, unless it REALLY IS a platform device
> (i.e.
> you are using device tree or platform data to find it.)  Is that what
> you are doing here?
> 

Sorry, this was an oversight.  When I was changing the wording in the
commit message away from platform device, I missed this one.

I will rewrite the commit message to make things clearer and correct
the platform device reference.

Thanks,
Tony

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3277 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ