netdev - Re: [patch net-next 2/3] net: introduce per-netns netdevice notifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:38:24 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, petrm@...lanox.com,
        sd@...asysnail.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 2/3] net: introduce per-netns netdevice notifiers

>  static int call_netdevice_notifiers_info(unsigned long val,
>  					 struct netdev_notifier_info *info)
>  {
> +	struct net *net = dev_net(info->dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> +	/* Run per-netns notifier block chain first, then run the global one.
> +	 * Hopefully, one day, the global one is going to be removed after
> +	 * all notifier block registrators get converted to be per-netns.
> +	 */

Hi Jiri

Is that really going to happen? register_netdevice_notifier() is used
in 130 files. Do you plan to spend the time to make it happen?

> +	ret = raw_notifier_call_chain(&net->netdev_chain, val, info);
> +	if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
> +		return ret;
>  	return raw_notifier_call_chain(&netdev_chain, val, info);
>  }

Humm. I wonder about NOTIFY_STOP_MASK here. These are two separate
chains. Should one chain be able to stop the other chain? Are there
other examples where NOTIFY_STOP_MASK crosses a chain boundary?

      Andrew