netdev - Re: [pull request][net 0/5] Mellanox, mlx5 fixes 2020-03-24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     saeedm@...lanox.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [pull request][net 0/5] Mellanox, mlx5 fixes 2020-03-24

From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:52:52 -0700

> This series introduces some fixes to mlx5 driver.
> 
> From Aya, Fixes to the RX error recovery flows
> From Leon, Fix IB capability mask
> 
> Please pull and let me know if there is any problem.

Pulled.

> For -stable v5.5
>  ('net/mlx5_core: Set IB capability mask1 to fix ib_srpt connection failure')
> 
> For -stable v5.4
>  ('net/mlx5e: Fix ICOSQ recovery flow with Striding RQ')
>  ('net/mlx5e: Do not recover from a non-fatal syndrome')
>  ('net/mlx5e: Fix missing reset of SW metadata in Striding RQ reset')
>  ('net/mlx5e: Enhance ICOSQ WQE info fields')

Queued up.

> The above patch ('net/mlx5e: Enhance ICOSQ WQE info fields')
> will fail to apply cleanly on v5.4 due to a trivial contextual conflict, 
> but it is an important fix, do I need to do something about it or just
> assume Greg will know how to handle this ?

I'll do my best to backport it and ask for your help if necessary.

Thanks.