| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:21:21 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, eli@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
parav@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] vhost: introduce vhost_vring_call
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 04:53:39PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2020/8/4 下午4:42, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 8/4/2020 4:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2020/7/31 下午2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> > > > This commit introduces struct vhost_vring_call which replaced
> > > > raw struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx in struct vhost_virtqueue.
> > > > Besides eventfd_ctx, it contains a spin lock and an
> > > > irq_bypass_producer in its structure.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
> > > > Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 4 ++--
> > > > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> > > > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 9 ++++++++-
> > > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > > index a54b60d6623f..df3cf386b0cd 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void handle_vq_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
> > > > static irqreturn_t vhost_vdpa_virtqueue_cb(void *private)
> > > > {
> > > > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = private;
> > > > - struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx = vq->call_ctx;
> > > > + struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> > > > if (call_ctx)
> > > > eventfd_signal(call_ctx, 1);
> > > > @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct
> > > > vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
> > > > break;
> > > > case VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL:
> > > > - if (vq->call_ctx) {
> > > > + if (vq->call_ctx.ctx) {
> > > > cb.callback = vhost_vdpa_virtqueue_cb;
> > > > cb.private = vq;
> > > > } else {
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > > index d7b8df3edffc..9f1a845a9302 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > > > @@ -298,6 +298,13 @@ static void vhost_vq_meta_reset(struct
> > > > vhost_dev *d)
> > > > __vhost_vq_meta_reset(d->vqs[i]);
> > > > }
> > > > +static void vhost_vring_call_reset(struct vhost_vring_call
> > > > *call_ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > + call_ctx->ctx = NULL;
> > > > + memset(&call_ctx->producer, 0x0, sizeof(struct
> > > > irq_bypass_producer));
> > > > + spin_lock_init(&call_ctx->ctx_lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > > > struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -319,13 +326,13 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > > > vq->log_base = NULL;
> > > > vq->error_ctx = NULL;
> > > > vq->kick = NULL;
> > > > - vq->call_ctx = NULL;
> > > > vq->log_ctx = NULL;
> > > > vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
> > > > vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq);
> > > > vq->busyloop_timeout = 0;
> > > > vq->umem = NULL;
> > > > vq->iotlb = NULL;
> > > > + vhost_vring_call_reset(&vq->call_ctx);
> > > > __vhost_vq_meta_reset(vq);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -685,8 +692,8 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > > > eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx);
> > > > if (dev->vqs[i]->kick)
> > > > fput(dev->vqs[i]->kick);
> > > > - if (dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx)
> > > > - eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx);
> > > > + if (dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx)
> > > > + eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx);
> > > > vhost_vq_reset(dev, dev->vqs[i]);
> > > > }
> > > > vhost_dev_free_iovecs(dev);
> > > > @@ -1629,7 +1636,10 @@ long vhost_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_dev
> > > > *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *arg
> > > > r = PTR_ERR(ctx);
> > > > break;
> > > > }
> > > > - swap(ctx, vq->call_ctx);
> > > > +
> > > > + spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> > > > + swap(ctx, vq->call_ctx.ctx);
> > > > + spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> > > > break;
> > > > case VHOST_SET_VRING_ERR:
> > > > if (copy_from_user(&f, argp, sizeof f)) {
> > > > @@ -2440,8 +2450,8 @@ static bool vhost_notify(struct vhost_dev
> > > > *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > > void vhost_signal(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > > {
> > > > /* Signal the Guest tell them we used something up. */
> > > > - if (vq->call_ctx && vhost_notify(dev, vq))
> > > > - eventfd_signal(vq->call_ctx, 1);
> > > > + if (vq->call_ctx.ctx && vhost_notify(dev, vq))
> > > > + eventfd_signal(vq->call_ctx.ctx, 1);
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_signal);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > index c8e96a095d3b..38eb1aa3b68d 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> > > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> > > > #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> > > > #include <linux/atomic.h>
> > > > #include <linux/vhost_iotlb.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/irqbypass.h>
> > > > struct vhost_work;
> > > > typedef void (*vhost_work_fn_t)(struct vhost_work *work);
> > > > @@ -60,6 +61,12 @@ enum vhost_uaddr_type {
> > > > VHOST_NUM_ADDRS = 3,
> > > > };
> > > > +struct vhost_vring_call {
> > > > + struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> > > > + struct irq_bypass_producer producer;
> > > > + spinlock_t ctx_lock;
> > >
> > >
> > > It's not clear to me why we need ctx_lock here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > we use this lock to protect the eventfd_ctx and irq from race conditions,
>
>
> We don't support irq notification from vDPA device driver in this version,
> do we still have race condition?
>
> Thanks
Jason I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
>
> > are you suggesting a better name?
> >
> > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > /* The virtqueue structure describes a queue attached to a device. */
> > > > struct vhost_virtqueue {
> > > > struct vhost_dev *dev;
> > > > @@ -72,7 +79,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> > > > vring_used_t __user *used;
> > > > const struct vhost_iotlb_map *meta_iotlb[VHOST_NUM_ADDRS];
> > > > struct file *kick;
> > > > - struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx;
> > > > + struct vhost_vring_call call_ctx;
> > > > struct eventfd_ctx *error_ctx;
> > > > struct eventfd_ctx *log_ctx;
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists