lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:39:50 +0200
From:   Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Zahari Doychev <zahari.doychev@...ux.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <simon.horman@...ronome.com>, <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        <jianbol@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2] tc flower: use right ethertype in
 icmp/arp parsing



On 2020-11-14 5:12 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 11/10/20 12:53 AM, Zahari Doychev wrote:
>> Currently the icmp and arp parsing functions are called with incorrect
>> ethtype in case of vlan or cvlan filter options. In this case either
>> cvlan_ethtype or vlan_ethtype has to be used. The ethtype is now updated
>> each time a vlan ethtype is matched during parsing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zahari Doychev <zahari.doychev@...ux.com>
>> ---
>>   tc/f_flower.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Thanks, looks much better.
> 
> applied to iproute2-next.
> 

Hi,

I didn't debug yet but with this commit I am failing to add a tc
rule I always could before. also the error msg doesn't make sense.

Example:

# tc filter add dev enp8s0f0 protocol 802.1Q parent ffff: prio 1 flower\
  skip_hw dst_mac e4:11:22:11:4a:51 src_mac e4:11:22:11:4a:50\
  vlan_ethtype 0x800 vlan_id 100 vlan_prio 0 action vlan pop action\
  mirred egress redirect dev enp8s0f0_0


Can't set "vlan_id" if ethertype isn't 802.1Q or 802.1AD


I used protocol 802.1Q and vlan_ethtype 0x800.
am i missing something? the rule should look different now?

Thanks,
Roi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ