netdev - [PATCH net-next 5.12 5/8] net: broadcom: bcm4908

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:12:36 +0100
From:   Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5.12 5/8] net: broadcom: bcm4908_enet: drop "inline" from C functions

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>

It seems preferred to let compiler optimize code if applicable.
While at it drop unused enet_umac_maskset().

Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm4908_enet.c | 19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm4908_enet.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm4908_enet.c
index f4e31646d50f..7d619aa9410a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm4908_enet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm4908_enet.c
@@ -75,17 +75,17 @@ struct bcm4908_enet {
  * R/W ops
  */
 
-static inline u32 enet_read(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset)
+static u32 enet_read(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset)
 {
 	return readl(enet->base + offset);
 }
 
-static inline void enet_write(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 value)
+static void enet_write(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 value)
 {
 	writel(value, enet->base + offset);
 }
 
-static inline void enet_maskset(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 mask, u32 set)
+static void enet_maskset(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 mask, u32 set)
 {
 	u32 val;
 
@@ -96,27 +96,22 @@ static inline void enet_maskset(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 mask,
 	enet_write(enet, offset, val);
 }
 
-static inline void enet_set(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 set)
+static void enet_set(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 set)
 {
 	enet_maskset(enet, offset, set, set);
 }
 
-static inline u32 enet_umac_read(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset)
+static u32 enet_umac_read(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset)
 {
 	return enet_read(enet, ENET_UNIMAC + offset);
 }
 
-static inline void enet_umac_write(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 value)
+static void enet_umac_write(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 value)
 {
 	enet_write(enet, ENET_UNIMAC + offset, value);
 }
 
-static inline void enet_umac_maskset(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 mask, u32 set)
-{
-	enet_maskset(enet, ENET_UNIMAC + offset, mask, set);
-}
-
-static inline void enet_umac_set(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 set)
+static void enet_umac_set(struct bcm4908_enet *enet, u16 offset, u32 set)
 {
 	enet_set(enet, ENET_UNIMAC + offset, set);
 }
-- 
2.26.2