netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 06/12] Documentation: networking: dsa: document the port_bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 02:14:17 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
        George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 06/12] Documentation: networking: dsa:
 document the port_bridge_flags method

> +  the bridge port flags for the CPU port. The assumption is that address
> +  learning should be statically enabled (if supported by the hardware) on the
> +  CPU port, and flooding towards the CPU port should also be enabled, in lack
> +  of an explicit address filtering mechanism in the DSA core.

Hi Vladimir

"in lack of" is a bit odd wording. Maybe "due to a lack of"

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew