lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:30:04 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 2/4] xdp: extend xdp_redirect_map with
 broadcast support

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:41:17PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > @@ -1491,13 +1492,20 @@ static __always_inline int __bpf_xdp_redirect_map(struct bpf_map *map, u32 ifind
> >  		 */
> >  		ri->map_id = INT_MAX; /* Valid map id idr range: [1,INT_MAX[ */
> >  		ri->map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_UNSPEC;
> > -		return flags;
> > +		return flags & BPF_F_ACTION_MASK;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ri->tgt_index = ifindex;
> >  	ri->map_id = map->id;
> >  	ri->map_type = map->map_type;
> >  
> > +	if ((map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP ||
> > +	     map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH) &&
> > +	    (flags & BPF_F_BROADCAST)) {
> > +		ri->flags = flags;
> 
> This, combined with this:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +	if (ri->flags & BPF_F_BROADCAST) {
> > +		map = READ_ONCE(ri->map);
> > +		WRITE_ONCE(ri->map, NULL);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	switch (map_type) {
> >  	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP:
> >  		fallthrough;
> >  	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH:
> > -		err = dev_map_enqueue(fwd, xdp, dev);
> > +		if (ri->flags & BPF_F_BROADCAST)
> > +			err = dev_map_enqueue_multi(xdp, dev, map,
> > +						    ri->flags & BPF_F_EXCLUDE_INGRESS);
> > +		else
> > +			err = dev_map_enqueue(fwd, xdp, dev);
> 
> Means that (since the flags value is never cleared again) once someone
> has done a broadcast redirect, that's all they'll ever get until the
> next reboot ;)

How about just get the ri->flags first and clean it directly. e.g.

flags = ri->flags;
ri->flags = 0;

With this we don't need to add an extra field ri->exclude_ingress as you
mentioned later.

People may also need the flags field in future.

> 
> Also, the bpf_clear_redirect_map() call has no effect since the call to
> dev_map_enqueue_multi() only checks the flags and not the value of the
> map pointer before deciding which enqueue function to call.
> 
> To fix both of these, how about changing the logic so that:
> 
> - __bpf_xdp_redirect_map() sets the map pointer if the broadcast flag is
>   set (and clears it if the flag isn't set!)

OK
> 
> - xdp_do_redirect() does the READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE on ri->map
>   unconditionally and then dispatches to dev_map_enqueue_multi() if the
>   read resulted in a non-NULL pointer
> 
> Also, it should be invalid to set the broadcast flag with a map type
> other than a devmap; __bpf_xdp_redirect_map() should check that.

The current code only do if (unlikely(flags > XDP_TX)) and didn't check the
map type. I also only set the map when there has devmap + broadcast flag.
Do you mean we need a more strict check? like

if (unlikely((flags & ~(BPF_F_ACTION_MASK | BPF_F_REDIR_MASK)) ||
	      (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP &&
	       map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH &&
	       flags & BPF_F_REDIR_MASK)))

Thanks
Hangbin

> 
> And finally, with the changes above, you no longer need the broadcast
> flag in do_redirect() at all, so you could just have a bool
> ri->exclude_ingress that is set in the helper and pass that directly to
> dev_map_enqueue_multi().
> 
> A selftest that validates that the above works as it's supposed to might
> be nice as well (i.e., one that broadcasts and does a regular redirect
> after one another)
> 
> -Toke
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ