netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] [RESEND] wireguard: disable in FIPS mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 09 Apr 2021 12:26:23 -0400
From:   Simo Sorce <simo@...hat.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] [RESEND] wireguard: disable in FIPS mode

On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 16:08 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:08:20AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > And how do you handle all the other places in the kernel that use
> > > > > > > ChaCha20 and
> > > > > > > SipHash?  For example, drivers/char/random.c?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Good question, I will check it and reply to you later.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I just read the code. The drivers/char/random.c do has some fips
> > > > > specific
> > > > > parts(seems not related to crypto). After commit e192be9d9a30 ("random:
> > > > > replace
> > > > > non-blocking pool with a Chacha20-based CRNG") we moved part of chacha
> > > > > code to
> > > > > lib/chacha20.c and make that code out of control.
> > > > > 
> > > > So you are saying that you removed drivers/char/random.c and
> > > > lib/chacha20.c from
> > > > your FIPS module boundary?  Why not do the same for WireGuard?
> > > 
> > > No, I mean this looks like a bug (using not allowed crypto in FIPS mode) and
> > > we should fix it.
> > 
> > The entirety of random.c is not compliant to FIPS rules. ChaCha20 is the least
> > of the problems. SP800-90B is the challenge. This is one of the motivation of
> > the design and architecture of the LRNG allowing different types of crypto and
> > have a different approach to post-process the data.
> > 
> > https://github.com/smuellerDD/lrng
> 
> Thanks Stephan for this info. After offline discussion with Herbert, here is
> what he said:
> 
> """
> This is not a problem in RHEL8 because the Crypto API RNG replaces /dev/random
> in FIPS mode.
> """
> 
> I'm not familiar with this code, not sure how upstream handle this.

It is an open problem upstream.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc