netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] net: vertexcom: Add MSE102x SPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:26:18 +0000
From:   Michael Heimpold <mhei@...mpold.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Michael Heimpold <michael.heimpold@...tech.com>,
        jimmy.shen@...texcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] net: vertexcom: Add MSE102x SPI support

Hi Andrew,

Zitat von Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>:

>> +static int mse102x_probe_spi(struct spi_device *spi)
>> +{
>
> ...
>
>> +	netif_carrier_off(mse->ndev);
>> +	ndev->if_port = IF_PORT_10BASET;
>
> That is not correct. Maybe you should add a IF_PORT_HOMEPLUG ?

Would a simple IF_PORT_HOMEPLUG be sufficient, or should it be
more precise as for Ethernet (10BASET, 100BASET...), e.g.
IF_PORT_HOMEPLUG_10
IF_PORT_HOMEPLUG_AV
IF_PORT_HOMEPLUG_AV2
IF_PORT_HOMEPLUG_GREENPHY

Thanks,
Michael


Content of type "application/pgp-keys" skipped