netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] wifi: ath9k: silence array-bounds warning on GCC 12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 22 May 2022 15:06:43 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     johannes@...solutions.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, toke@...e.dk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] wifi: ath9k: silence array-bounds warning on GCC 12

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:

> On Sat, 21 May 2022 09:58:28 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > +# FIXME: temporarily silence -Warray-bounds on non W=1+ builds
>> > +ifndef KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN
>> > +CFLAGS_mac.o += -Wno-array-bounds
>> > +endif  
>> 
>> There are now four wireless drivers which need this hack. Wouldn't it be
>> easier to add -Wno-array-bounds for GCC 12 globally instead of adding
>> the same hack to multiple drivers?
>
> I mean.. it's definitely a hack, I'm surprised more people aren't
> complaining. Kees was against disabling it everywhere, AFAIU:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202204201117.F44DCF9@keescook/

Wasn't Kees objecting of disabling array-bounds for all GCC versions?
That I understand, but I'm merely suggesting to disable the warning only
on GCC 12 until the compiler is fixed or the drivers are fixed.

> WiFi is a bit unfortunate but we only have 3 cases in the rest of
> networking so it's not _terribly_ common.
>
> IDK, I'd love to not see all the warnings every time someone touches
> netdevice.h :( I made a note to remove the workaround once GCC 12 gets
> its act together, that's the best I could come up with.

Ok, fair enough. I'm just worried these will be left lingering for a
long time and do more harm than good :)

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches