netdev - [patch net-next 1/4] net: devlink: introduce "unregistering" mark and use it during devlinks iteration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:10:35 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, idosch@...dia.com,
        petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
        leon@...nel.org, moshe@...dia.com
Subject: [patch net-next 1/4] net: devlink: introduce "unregistering" mark and use it during devlinks iteration

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>

Add new mark called "unregistering" to be set at the beginning of
devlink_unregister() function. Check this mark during devlinks
iteration in order to prevent getting a reference of devlink which is
being currently unregistered.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
 net/core/devlink.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index c43c96554a3e..6b20196ada1a 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_selftest_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTEST_
 
 static DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(devlinks, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
 #define DEVLINK_REGISTERED XA_MARK_1
+#define DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING XA_MARK_2
 
 /* devlink instances are open to the access from the user space after
  * devlink_register() call. Such logical barrier allows us to have certain
@@ -305,6 +306,14 @@ devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp, xa_mark_t filter,
 	devlink = xa_find_fn(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
 	if (!devlink)
 		goto unlock;
+
+	/* In case devlink_unregister() was already called and "unregistering"
+	 * mark was set, do not allow to get a devlink reference here.
+	 * This prevents live-lock of devlink_unregister() wait for completion.
+	 */
+	if (xa_get_mark(&devlinks, *indexp, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING))
+		goto retry;
+
 	/* For a possible retry, the xa_find_after() should be always used */
 	xa_find_fn = xa_find_after;
 	if (!devlink_try_get(devlink))
@@ -9809,11 +9818,13 @@ void devlink_unregister(struct devlink *devlink)
 	ASSERT_DEVLINK_REGISTERED(devlink);
 	/* Make sure that we are in .remove() routine */
 
+	xa_set_mark(&devlinks, devlink->index, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING);
 	devlink_put(devlink);
 	wait_for_completion(&devlink->comp);
 
 	devlink_notify_unregister(devlink);
 	xa_clear_mark(&devlinks, devlink->index, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
+	xa_clear_mark(&devlinks, devlink->index, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_unregister);
 
-- 
2.35.3