netdev - [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Cover listener cloning with progs attached to sockmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 21 Jan 2023 13:41:46 +0100
From:   Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Cover listener cloning with
 progs attached to sockmap

Today we test if a child socket is cloned properly from a listening socket
inside a sockmap only when there are no BPF programs attached to the map.

A bug has been reported [1] for the case when sockmap has a verdict program
attached. So cover this case as well to prevent regressions.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/00000000000073b14905ef2e7401@google.com

Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c      | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
index 499fba8f55b9..567e07c19ecc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
@@ -563,8 +563,7 @@ static void test_update_existing(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel __always_unuse
 /* Exercise the code path where we destroy child sockets that never
  * got accept()'ed, aka orphans, when parent socket gets closed.
  */
-static void test_destroy_orphan_child(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel __always_unused,
-				      int family, int sotype, int mapfd)
+static void do_destroy_orphan_child(int family, int sotype, int mapfd)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_storage addr;
 	socklen_t len;
@@ -595,6 +594,33 @@ static void test_destroy_orphan_child(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel __always_
 	xclose(s);
 }
 
+static void test_destroy_orphan_child(struct test_sockmap_listen *skel,
+				      int family, int sotype, int mapfd)
+{
+	int msg_verdict = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_msg_verdict);
+	int skb_verdict = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
+	const struct test {
+		int progfd;
+		enum bpf_attach_type atype;
+	} tests[] = {
+		{ -1, -1 },
+		{ msg_verdict, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT },
+		{ skb_verdict, BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT },
+	};
+	const struct test *t;
+
+	for (t = tests; t < tests + ARRAY_SIZE(tests); t++) {
+		if (t->progfd != -1 &&
+		    xbpf_prog_attach(t->progfd, mapfd, t->atype, 0) != 0)
+			return;
+
+		do_destroy_orphan_child(family, sotype, mapfd);
+
+		if (t->progfd != -1)
+			xbpf_prog_detach2(t->progfd, mapfd, t->atype);
+	}
+}
+
 /* Perform a passive open after removing listening socket from SOCKMAP
  * to ensure that callbacks get restored properly.
  */

-- 
2.39.0