[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:26:28 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
hawk@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-net: Maintain reverse cleanup order
Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 06:00:38AM CET, parav@...dia.com wrote:
>To easily audit the code, better to keep the device stop()
>sequence to be mirror of the device open() sequence.
>
>Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
If this is not fixing bug (which I believe is the case), you should
target it to net-next ([patch net-next] ..).
>---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>index b7d0b54c3bb0..1f8168e0f64d 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>@@ -2279,9 +2279,9 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>
> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>+ virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> napi_disable(&vi->rq[i].napi);
> xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&vi->rq[i].xdp_rxq);
>- virtnet_napi_tx_disable(&vi->sq[i].napi);
> }
>
> return 0;
>--
>2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists