netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] net/handshake: Create a NETLINK service for handling handshake requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:32:39 +0000
From:   Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC:     Chuck Lever <cel@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev" 
        <kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev>,
        John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] net/handshake: Create a NETLINK service for
 handling handshake requests


> On Mar 22, 2023, at 9:35 AM, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 22, 2023, at 5:03 AM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> plus explicitly triggering some errors path e.g. 
>> 
>> hn_pending_max+1 consecutive submit with no accept
>> handshake_cancel after handshake_complete
>> multiple handshake_complete on the same req
>> multiple handshake_cancel on the same req
> 
> OK. I'm wondering if a user agent needs to be running
> for these, in which case, running Kunit in its stand-
> alone mode (ie, under UML) might not work at all.
> 
> Just thinking out loud... Kunit after all might not be
> the right tool for this job.

Actually, maybe I can make handshake_genl_notify() a
no-op when running under Kunit. That should enable
tests to run without a user space handler agent.


--
Chuck Lever