lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 12:32:12 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>,
	Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
	poros@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 7/8] netdev: expose DPLL pin handle for netdevice

Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:31:40PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:20:08 -0700 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> @@ -2411,6 +2412,10 @@ struct net_device {
>>  	struct rtnl_hw_stats64	*offload_xstats_l3;
>>  
>>  	struct devlink_port	*devlink_port;
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DPLL)
>> +	struct dpll_pin		*dpll_pin;
>> +#endif
>
>kdoc is missing. I'm guessing that one pin covers all current user
>cases but we should clearly document on what this pin is, so that when
>we extend the code to support multiple pins (in/out, per lane, idk)
>we know which one this was.. ?

Oh, yeah. Will do.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ