netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/3] rtnetlink: move validate_linkmsg into rtnl_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:49:56 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Thomas Graf
 <tgraf@...radead.org>, Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] rtnetlink: move validate_linkmsg into
 rtnl_create_link

On Thu, 25 May 2023 17:49:15 -0400 Xin Long wrote:
> In commit 644c7eebbfd5 ("rtnetlink: validate attributes in do_setlink()"),
> it moved validate_linkmsg() from rtnl_setlink() to do_setlink(). However,
> as validate_linkmsg() is also called in __rtnl_newlink(), it caused
> validate_linkmsg() being called twice when running 'ip link set'.
> 
> The validate_linkmsg() was introduced by commit 1840bb13c22f5b ("[RTNL]:
> Validate hardware and broadcast address attribute for RTM_NEWLINK") for
> existing links. After adding it in do_setlink(), there's no need to call
> it in __rtnl_newlink().
> 
> Instead of deleting it from __rtnl_newlink(), this patch moves it to
> rtnl_create_link() to fix the missing validation for the new created
> links.
> 
> Fixes: 644c7eebbfd5 ("rtnetlink: validate attributes in do_setlink()")

I don't see any bug in here, is there one? Or you're just trying 
to avoid calling validation twice? I think it's better to validate 
twice than validate after some changes have already been applied 
by __rtnl_newlink()...  If we really care about the double validation
we should pull the validation out of do_setlink(), IMHO.
-- 
pw-bot: cr