lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 22:03:41 +0900
From: Akihiro Suda <suda.kyoto@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	"akihiro.suda.cz@....ntt.co.jp" <akihiro.suda.cz@....ntt.co.jp>, 
	"akihirosuda@....sr.ht" <akihirosuda@....sr.ht>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	"segoon@...nwall.com" <segoon@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux] net/ipv4: ping_group_range: allow GID from
 2147483648 to 4294967294

2023年6月2日(金) 19:51 David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>:
>
> From: Kuniyuki Iwashima
> > Sent: 01 June 2023 00:00
> ....
> > > > --- a/include/net/ping.h
> > > > +++ b/include/net/ping.h
> > > > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
> > > >   * gid_t is either uint or ushort.  We want to pass it to
> > > >   * proc_dointvec_minmax(), so it must not be larger than MAX_INT
> > > >   */
> > > > -#define GID_T_MAX (((gid_t)~0U) >> 1)
> > > > +#define GID_T_MAX ((gid_t)~0U)
>
> Doesn't that comment need updating?
>
> I do wonder how much code breaks for gid > MAXINT.
> How much testing does it actually get??

It is fixed in v3:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230601031305.55901-1-akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp/

```
-/*
- * gid_t is either uint or ushort.  We want to pass it to
- * proc_dointvec_minmax(), so it must not be larger than MAX_INT
- */
-#define GID_T_MAX (((gid_t)~0U) >> 1)
+#define GID_T_MAX (((gid_t)~0U) - 1)
```

Tested with 4294967294, 4294967295 (EINVAL), and 4294967296 (EINVAL), on x86_64.




>         David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ