netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] arm64, execmem: extend execmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 11:36:58 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] arm64, execmem: extend execmem_params for
 generated code definitions

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 09:57:59AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > This is growing fast. :) We have 3 now: text, data, jit. And it will be
> > 5 when we split data into rw data, ro data, ro after init data. I wonder
> > whether we should still do some type enum here. But we can revisit
> > this topic later.
> 
> I don't think we'd need 5. Four at most :)
> 
> I don't know yet what would be the best way to differentiate RW and RO
> data, but ro_after_init surely won't need a new type. It either will be
> allocated as RW and then the caller will have to set it RO after
> initialization is done, or it will be allocated as RO and the caller will
> have to do something like text_poke to update it.

Perhaps ro_after_init could use the same allocation interface and share
pages with ro pages - if we just added a refcount for "this page
currently needs to be rw, module is still loading?"

text_poke() approach wouldn't be workable, you'd have to audit and fix
all module init code in the entire kernel.