netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: tls: enable __GFP_ZERO upon tls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 11:36:51 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, glider@...gle.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, 
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, 
	syzbot <syzbot+828dfc12440b4f6f305d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, 
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...dia.com>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tls: enable __GFP_ZERO upon tls_init()

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 15:49, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> syzbot is reporting uninit-value at aes_encrypt(), for block cipher assumes
> that bytes to encrypt/decrypt is multiple of block size for that cipher but
> tls_alloc_encrypted_msg() is not initializing padding bytes when
> required_size is not multiple of block cipher's block size.
>
> In order to make sure that padding bytes are automatically initialized,
> enable __GFP_ZERO flag when setsockopt(SOL_TCP, TCP_ULP, "tls") is called.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+828dfc12440b4f6f305d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=828dfc12440b4f6f305d

Maybe I am missing something, but this syzkaller report appears to b a
huge collection of uninit-value reports, of which only one is related
to bpx_tx_verdict(), and that one has nor reproducer.

So even if this would be the right fix, I don't think closing that
issue makes sense, so? The issue refers to a couple of other
occcurences of uninit-value in aesti_encrypt, which do seem related.

> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
> According to C reproducer, this problem happens when bpf_exec_tx_verdict() is
> called with lower 4 bits of required_size being 0001 and does not happen when
> being 0100. Thus, I assumed that this problem is caused by lack of initializing
> padding bytes.
> But I couldn't figure out why KMSAN reports this problem when bpf_exec_tx_verdict()
> is called with lower 4 bits of required_size being 0001 for the second time and
> does not report this problem when bpf_exec_tx_verdict() is called with lower
> 4 bits of required_size being 0001 for the first time. More deeper problem exists?
> KMSAN reporting this problem when accessing u64 relevant?
>

As Eric pointed out as well, zeroing the allocation papers over the problem.

Why are you sending this now? Do you have a reproducer for this issue?

>  net/tls/tls_main.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
> index f2e7302a4d96..cd5366966864 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
> @@ -1025,6 +1025,7 @@ static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
>         struct tls_context *ctx;
>         int rc = 0;
>
> +       sk->sk_allocation |= __GFP_ZERO;
>         tls_build_proto(sk);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TLS_TOE
> --
> 2.34.1
>