netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] f_flower: Treat port 0 as valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 23:00:22 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org, dsahern@...il.com,
 petrm@...dia.com, lukasz.czapnik@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] f_flower: Treat port 0 as valid

Hello:

This patch was applied to iproute2/iproute2.git (main)
by Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>:

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:59:03 +0300 you wrote:
> It is not currently possible to add a filter matching on port 0 despite
> it being a valid port number. This is caused by cited commit which
> treats a value of 0 as an indication that the port was not specified.
> 
> Instead of inferring that a port range was specified by checking that both
> the minimum and the maximum ports are non-zero, simply add a boolean
> argument to parse_range() and set it after parsing a port range.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [iproute2] f_flower: Treat port 0 as valid
    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git/commit/?id=61695c493ec1

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html