lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 10:29:38 +0800
From: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
To: "'Russell King \(Oracle\)'" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: "'Simon Horman'" <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
	<kabel@...nel.org>,
	<andrew@...n.ch>,
	<hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: phy: marvell10g: fix 88x3310 power up

On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 7:47 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 05:58:28PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 5:49 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 05:12:33PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > > > On Monday, July 17, 2023 8:23 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:51:38PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > There are two places that mv3310_reset() is called, mv3310_config_mdix()
> > > > > > > > > > and mv3310_set_edpd(). One of them is in the probe function, after we
> > > > > > > > > > have powered up the PHY.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think we need much more information from the reporter before we can
> > > > > > > > > > guess which commit is a problem, if any.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > When does the reset time out?
> > > > > > > > > > What is the code path that we see mv3310_reset() timing out?
> > > > > > > > > > Does the problem happen while resuming or probing?
> > > > > > > > > > How soon after clearing the power down bit is mv3310_reset() called?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I need to test it more times for more information.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As far as I know, reset timeout appears in mv3310_set_edpd(), after mv3310_power_up()
> > > > > > > > > in mv3310_config_init().
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Now what I'm confused about is, sometimes there was weird values while probing, just
> > > > > > > > > to read out a weird firmware version, that caused the test to fail.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And for this phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout(), it only succeeds when sleep_before_read = true.
> > > > > > > > > Otherwise, it would never succeed to clear the power down bit. Currently it looks like clearing
> > > > > > > > > the bit takes about 1ms.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So, reading the bit before the first delay period results in the bit not
> > > > > > > > clearing, despite having written it to be zero?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes. So in the original code, there is no delay to read the register again for
> > > > > > > setting software reset bit. I think the power down bit is not actually cleared
> > > > > > > in my test.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Russell,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I confirmed last week that this change is valid to make mv3310_reset() success.
> > > > > > But now reset fails again, only on port 0. Reset timeout still appears in
> > > > > > mv3310_config_init() -> mv3310_set_edpd() -> mv3310_reset(). I deleted this
> > > > > > change to test again, and the result shows that this change is valid for port 1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I'm a little confused. Since I don't have programming guidelines for this PHY,
> > > > > > but only a datasheet. Could you please help to check for any possible problems
> > > > > > with it?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the question that's missing is... why do other 88x3310 users not
> > > > > see this problem - what is special about your port 0?
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe there's a clue with the hardware schematics? Do you have access to
> > > > > those?
> > > >
> > > > This problem never happened again after I poweroff and restart the machine.
> > > > However, this patch is still required to successfully probe the PHY.
> > > >
> > > > One thing I've noticed is that there is restriction in mv3310_power_up(), software
> > > > reset not performed when priv->firmware_ver < 0x00030000. And my 88x3310's
> > > > firmware version happens to 0x20200. Will this restriction cause subsequent reset
> > > > timeout(without this patch)?
> > >
> > > We (Matteo and I) discovered the need for software reset by
> > > experimentation on his Macchiatobin and trying different firmware
> > > versions. Essentially, I had 0.2.1.0 which didn't need the software
> > > reset, Matteo had 0.3.3.0 which did seem to need it.
> > >
> > > I also upgraded my firmware to 0.3.3.0 and even 0.3.10.0 and confirmed
> > > that the software reset works on the two PHYs on my boards.
> > >
> > > What I don't understand is "this patch is still required to successfully
> > > probe the PHY". The power-up path is not called during probe - nor is
> > > the EDPD path. By "probe" I'm assuming we're talking about the driver
> > > probe, in other words, mv3310_probe(), not the config_init - it may be
> > > that you're terminology is not matching phylib's terminology. Please
> > > can you clarify.
> >
> > I'm sorry for the mistake in my description. I mean MAC driver probe, in fact
> > it is in phy_connect_direct(), to call mv3310_config_init().
> 
> Okay, so how about this for an alternative theory.
> 
> The PHY is being probed, which places the PHY in power down mode.
> Then your network driver (which?) gets probed, connects immediately
> to the PHY, which attempts to power up the PHY - but maybe the PHY
> hasn't finished powering down yet, and thus delays the powering up.
> 
> However, according to the functional spec, placing the device in
> power-down mode as we do is immediate.
> 
> Please can you try experimenting with a delay in mv3310_config_init()
> before the call to mv3310_power_up() to see whether that has any
> beneficial effect?

I experimented with delays of 100ms to 1s, all reset timed out. Unfortunately,
the theory doesn't seem to be true. :(

There is a log dump while I tried in 200ms.

[59697.591809] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=6, val=c000
[59697.592811] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=5, val=9a
[59697.593814] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=2, val=2b
[59697.594817] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=3, val=9ab
[59697.595811] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=2, val=2b
[59697.596811] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=3, val=9ab
[59697.597811] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=4, regnum=2, val=141
[59697.598809] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=4, regnum=3, val=dab
[59697.599809] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=7, regnum=2, val=2b
[59697.600810] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=7, regnum=3, val=9ab
[59697.601815] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1e, regnum=8, val=0
[59697.602930] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=8, val=fffe
[59697.608811] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=d00d, val=680b
[59697.609823] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=c050, val=7e
[59697.610814] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=c011, val=2
[59697.611817] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=c012, val=200
[59697.611820] mv88x3310 txgbe-400:00: Firmware version 0.2.2.0
[59697.612817] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f001, val=803
[59697.612820] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [W]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f08c, val=9600
[59697.613819] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f08a, val=cd9a
[59697.613822] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [W]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f08a, val=d9a
[59697.614818] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=7, regnum=1, val=9ab
[59697.615816] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=8, val=9701
[59697.616817] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=b, val=1a4
[59697.617814] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=14, val=e
[59697.618809] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1, regnum=15, val=3
[59697.619811] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=7, regnum=3c, val=0
[59697.619831] mv88x3310 txgbe-400:00: attached PHY driver (mii_bus:phy_addr=txgbe-400:00, irq=POLL)
[59697.830169] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f001, val=803
[59697.830179] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [W]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f001, val=3
[59697.830926] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=1f, regnum=f001, val=803
[59697.831926] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=8000, val=60
[59697.831932] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [W]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=8000, val=360
[59697.832926] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.838922] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.844815] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.850812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.856813] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.862812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.868812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.874812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.880812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.886812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.892812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.898812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.904812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.910812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.916812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.922812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.928812] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.934813] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.935813] txgbe 0000:04:00.0: [R]phy_addr=0, devnum=3, regnum=0, val=a040
[59697.935815] mv88x3310 txgbe-400:00: mv3310_reset failed: -110


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ