netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 1/2] net-memcg: Scopify the indicators of sockmem pressure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 17:20:39 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>,
	Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 1/2] net-memcg: Scopify the indicators of
 sockmem pressure

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 08:41:43PM +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
> Now there are two indicators of socket memory pressure sit inside
> struct mem_cgroup, socket_pressure and tcpmem_pressure.

Hi Abel!

> When in legacy mode aka. cgroupv1, the socket memory is charged
> into a separate counter memcg->tcpmem rather than ->memory, so
> the reclaim pressure of the memcg has nothing to do with socket's
> pressure at all.

But we still might set memcg->socket_pressure and propagate the pressure,
right?
If you're changing this, you need to provide a bit more data on why it's
a good idea. I'm not saying the current status is perfect, but I think we need
a bit more justification for this change.

> While for default mode, the ->tcpmem is simply
> not used.
> 
> So {socket,tcpmem}_pressure are only used in default/legacy mode
> respectively. This patch fixes the pieces of code that make mixed
> use of both.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 ++--
>  mm/vmpressure.c            | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 5818af8eca5a..5860c7f316b9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -1727,8 +1727,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk);
>  void mem_cgroup_sk_free(struct sock *sk);
>  static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>  {
> -	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && memcg->tcpmem_pressure)
> -		return true;
> +	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
> +		return !!memcg->tcpmem_pressure;

So here you can have something like
   if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) {
        do {
            if (time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(memcg->socket_pressure)))
                  return true;
        } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
   } else {
	return !!READ_ONCE(memcg->socket_pressure);
   }

And, please, add a bold comment here or nearby the socket_pressure definition
that it has a different semantics in the legacy and default modes.

Overall I think it's a good idea to clean these things up and thank you
for working on this. But I wonder if we can make the next step and leave only
one mechanism for both cgroup v1 and v2 instead of having this weird setup
where memcg->socket_pressure is set differently from different paths on cgroup
v1 and v2.

Thanks!