netdev - Re: [RFC net-next v4 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add TX side to xdp_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 18:55:17 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
 ast@...nel.org, 
 daniel@...earbox.net, 
 andrii@...nel.org, 
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, 
 song@...nel.org, 
 yhs@...com, 
 john.fastabend@...il.com, 
 kpsingh@...nel.org, 
 haoluo@...gle.com, 
 jolsa@...nel.org, 
 kuba@...nel.org, 
 toke@...nel.org, 
 willemb@...gle.com, 
 dsahern@...nel.org, 
 magnus.karlsson@...el.com, 
 bjorn@...nel.org, 
 maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, 
 hawk@...nel.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 xdp-hints@...-project.net
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v4 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add TX side to
 xdp_hw_metadata

Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 07/25, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > When we get packets on port 9091, we swap src/dst and send it out.
> > > At this point, we also request the timestamp and plumb it back
> > > to the userspace. The userspace simply prints the timestamp.
> > > 
> > > Also print current UDP checksum, rewrite it with the pseudo-header
> > > checksum and offload TX checksum calculation to devtx. Upon
> > > completion, report TX checksum back (mlx5 doesn't put it back, so
> > > I've used tcpdump to confirm that the checksum is correct).
> > > 
> > > Some other related changes:
> > > - switched to zerocopy mode by default; new flag can be used to force
> > >   old behavior
> > > - request fixed TX_METADATA_LEN headroom
> > > - some other small fixes (umem size, fill idx+i, etc)
> > > 
> > > mvbz3:~# ./xdp_hw_metadata eth3 -c mlx5e_devtx_complete_xdp -s mlx5e_devtx_submit_xd
> > > attach rx bpf program...
> > > ...
> > > 0x206d298: rx_desc[0]->addr=80100 addr=80100 comp_addr=80100
> > > rx_hash: 0x2BFB7FEC with RSS type:0x2A
> > > rx_timestamp:  1690238278345877848 (sec:1690238278.3459)
> > > XDP RX-time:   1690238278538397674 (sec:1690238278.5384) delta sec:0.1925 (192519.826 usec)
> > > AF_XDP time:   1690238278538515250 (sec:1690238278.5385) delta sec:0.0001 (117.576 usec)
> > > 0x206d298: ping-pong with csum=8e3b (want 57c9) csum_start=54 csum_offset=6
> > > 0x206d298: complete tx idx=0 addr=10
> > > 0x206d298: tx_timestamp:  1690238278577008140 (sec:1690238278.5770)
> > > 0x206d298: complete rx idx=128 addr=80100
> > > 
> > > mvbz4:~# nc  -Nu -q1 ${MVBZ3_LINK_LOCAL_IP}%eth3 9091
> > > 
> > > mvbz4:~# tcpdump -vvx -i eth3 udp
> > > tcpdump: listening on eth3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
> > > 10:12:43.901436 IP6 (flowlabel 0x7a5d2, hlim 127, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 11) fe80::1270:fdff:fe48:1087.44339 > fe80::1270:fdff:fe48:1077.9091: [bad udp cksum 0x3b8e -> 0x0b4b!] UDP, length 3
> > >         0x0000:  6007 a5d2 000b 117f fe80 0000 0000 0000
> > >         0x0010:  1270 fdff fe48 1087 fe80 0000 0000 0000
> > >         0x0020:  1270 fdff fe48 1077 ad33 2383 000b 3b8e
> > >         0x0030:  7864 70
> > > 10:12:43.902125 IP6 (flowlabel 0x7a5d2, hlim 127, next-header UDP (17) payload length: 11) fe80::1270:fdff:fe48:1077.9091 > fe80::1270:fdff:fe48:1087.44339: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 3
> > >         0x0000:  6007 a5d2 000b 117f fe80 0000 0000 0000
> > >         0x0010:  1270 fdff fe48 1077 fe80 0000 0000 0000
> > >         0x0020:  1270 fdff fe48 1087 2383 ad33 000b 0b4b
> > >         0x0030:  7864 70
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 191 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > > +static void usage(const char *prog)
> > > +{
> > > +	fprintf(stderr,
> > > +		"usage: %s [OPTS] <ifname>\n"
> > > +		"OPTS:\n"
> > > +		"    -T    don't generate AF_XDP reply (rx metadata only)\n"
> > > +		"    -Z    run in copy mode\n",
> > 
> > nit: makes more sense to call copy mode 'C', rather than 'Z'
> 
> Initially I had -c and -s for completion/submission bpf hooks. Now that
> these are gone, can actually use -c. Capital letter here actually means
> 'not'. Z - not zerocopy. T - no tx.
> 
> I'll rename to:
> -r - rx only
> -c - copy mode
> 
> LMK if it doesn't make sense..

Sounds great, thanks. I did not grasp the capitalization implies negation.