netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] samples/bpf: Remove unmaintained XDP sample utilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 08:43:33 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] samples/bpf: Remove unmaintained XDP
 sample utilities

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:54 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The samples/bpf directory in the kernel tree started out as a way of showcasing
> different aspects of BPF functionality by writing small utility programs for
> each feature. However, as the BPF subsystem has matured, the preferred way of
> including userspace code with a feature has become the BPF selftests, which also
> have the benefit of being consistently run as part of the BPF CI system.

Did you miss my previous email?

---
Could you add this link with details to samples/bpf/README.rst,
so that folks know where to look for them?

Other than that the set makes sense to me.
---