lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:28:06 +0800
From: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
To: mkubecek@...e.cz
Cc: oss-drivers@...igine.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
	Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>
Subject: [PATCH ethtool] rxclass: fix a bug in rmgr when searching for empty slot

When reverse searching the list in rmgr for a free location the last
slot (first slot searched) in the list needs special care as it might
not span the full word length. This is done by building a bit-mask
covering the not-active parts of the last word and using that to judge
if there is a free location in the last word or not. Once that is known
searching in the last slot, or to skip it, can be done by the same
algorithm as for the other slots in the list.

There is a bug in creating the bit-mask for the non-active parts of the
last slot where the 0-indexed nature of bit addressing is not taken into
account when shifting. This leads to a one-off bug, fix it.

Fixes: 8d63f72ccdcb ("Add RX packet classification interface")
Signed-off-by: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>
---
 rxclass.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/rxclass.c b/rxclass.c
index 66cf00ba7728..b2471f807d5d 100644
--- a/rxclass.c
+++ b/rxclass.c
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static int rmgr_find_empty_slot(struct rmgr_ctrl *rmgr,
 	 * If loc rolls over it should be greater than or equal to rmgr->size
 	 * and as such we know we have reached the end of the list.
 	 */
-	if (!~(rmgr->slot[slot_num] | (~1UL << rmgr->size % BITS_PER_LONG))) {
+	if (!~(rmgr->slot[slot_num] | (~1UL << (rmgr->size - 1) % BITS_PER_LONG))) {
 		loc -= 1 + (loc % BITS_PER_LONG);
 		slot_num--;
 	}
-- 
2.39.3


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ