netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/5] Documentations: Analyze heavily used Networking related structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 08:07:05 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, 
	Mubashir Adnan Qureshi <mubashirq@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chao Wu <wwchao@...gle.com>, 
	Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>, Pradeep Nemavat <pnemavat@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/5] Documentations: Analyze heavily used
 Networking related structs

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:31 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 23:32:57 +0000 Coco Li wrote:
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/index.rst
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/inet_connection_sock.rst
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/inet_sock.rst
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/net_device.rst
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/netns_ipv4_sysctl.rst
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/snmp.rst
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/tcp_sock.rst
>
> Can we add a small MAINTAINERS file entry for these files?
> To clearly state who's taking on keeping them in sync?
> Maybe Eric?

+2, I am the one ;)