netdev - RE: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig - failed - net/wireless/shipped-certs.c:92:1: error: expected '}' before numeric constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:29:28 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: "naresh.kamboju@...aro.org" <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell
	<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "benjamin.berg@...el.com"
	<benjamin.berg@...el.com>, "dan.carpenter@...aro.org"
	<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"johannes.berg@...el.com" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	"lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com" <miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com>,
	"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig - failed -
 net/wireless/shipped-certs.c:92:1: error: expected '}' before numeric
 constant

Hi all,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Biju Das
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 3:00 PM
> Subject: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig - failed - net/wireless/shipped-
> certs.c:92:1: error: expected '}' before numeric constant
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am also seeing similar issue[1] with below tool chain[2] on linux-next.
> 
> [1]
> gcc-arm-10.3-2021.07-x86_64-aarch64-none-linux-gnu
> 
> Looks like latest code in net/wireless is not buildable with older
> toolchain.
> 
> Can we revert the change to unblock build failure on next?
> 
> 
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYv9j08=+-CpJdtAV1z9-8KYbYcH8YOvWjbz4TgP7pB2TA@mail.gmail.com/


FYI, This issue is seen on today next as well, 
the generated code[2] is missing a comma leading to
Build failure. Is it a requirement to use latest toolchain for linux-next?


[2]
0x45, 0x4e, 0xc3
/* Seth Forshee's regdb certificate */
0x30, 0x82, 0x02, 0xa4, 0x30, 0x82, 0x01, 0x8c,

Cheers,
Biju