| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 15:57:57 +0800
From: Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, <corbet@....net>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 14/14] dt-bindings: net: ar803x: add qca8084 PHY
properties
On 12/15/2023 9:42 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 08:16:53PM +0800, Jie Luo wrote:
>> On 12/15/2023 7:25 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> The "maxItems: 1" of the property resets is defined in ethernet-phy.yaml
>>>> that is referenced by qca,ar803x.yaml, but i have 11 reset instances
>>>> used for qca8084 PHY
>>>
>>> 11!?!?? Really? Why?
>>>
>>> I assume the order and timer matters, otherwise why would you need
>>> 11? So the PHY driver needs to handle this, not phylib framework. So
>>> you will be adding vendor properties to describe all 11 of them. So
>>> ethernet-phy.yaml does not matter.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>
>> Since these resets need to be configured in the special sequence, and
>> these clocks need to be configured with different clock rate.
>>
>> But the clock instance get, the property name is fixed to "clock-names"
>> according to the function of_parse_clkspec, and the reset property name
>> is also fixed to "reset-names" from function __of_reset_control_get.
>
> I think you need to give more details about this.
>
> Where are these 11 resets located? What is the sequence? Why does the
> PHY driver need to deal with each individual reset?
All these resets and clocks are located in qca8084 chip that includes
the GCC module registered as the clock provider, all these clocks and
resets are from qca8084 clock provider driver, the clock and reset name
prefix with PCS or EPHY is for the individual MDIO device, others are
the qca8084 level, but these clocks and resets need to be initialized
completely, then the PHY probe function can be initialized correctly
with the PHY capabilities acquired after the qca8084 chip level GPIO
reset.
The sequence code is realized in the function qca8084_clock_config of
the patch <net: phy: at803x: add qca808x initial config sequence>, this
function is doing as below.
1. set the Ethernet system clock tree as 25M clock rate.
2. reset and enable PCS system clocks.
3. reset and enable the PHY system clocks.
4. loading the efuse, which is not related the clock and reset.
>
> IMHO, a PHY driver should _not_ be dealing with the resets outside of
> the PHY device itself, and I find it hard to imagine that qca8084
> would have 11 external resets.
Indeed, these resets are not for a PHY device, some are the chip level
resets, and each PHY has the individual resets.
>
> If these are 11 internal resets (to qca8084) then why are you using the
> reset subsystem, and why do you need to describe them in DT? Surely if
> they are internal to the PHY, that can be encapsulated within the PHY
> driver?
These resets and clocks are realized by the qca8k clock controller
driver, and i use the clock consumer APIs to initialize these clocks and
resets,
when qca8084 works on the PHY mode, there are only PHY driver
and PCS driver needed to be enabled to make PHY working, and these
clocks and resets need to be initialized before the PHY probe function
finished correctly, where the phy capabilities is read during the probe
function.
>
> This is an example of why it is useful to have an _example_ of the use
> of this binding, because it would answer some of the above questions.
>
Yes, Russell, i will add an example in the DT doc in the next patch set.
The following is the device node used for the current qca8084 PHY
code design.
mdio: mdio@...00 {
ethernet-phy@0 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-id004d.d180";
reg = <1>;
qcom,phy-addr-fixup = <1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
qcom,phy-work-mode = <2>;
clocks = <&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_APB_BRIDGE_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_AHB_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_SEC_CTRL_AHB_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_TLMM_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_TLMM_AHB_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_CNOC_AHB_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_MDIO_AHB_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_MDIO_MASTER_AHB_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_SRDS0_SYS_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_SRDS1_SYS_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY0_SYS_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY1_SYS_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY2_SYS_CLK>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY3_SYS_CLK>;
clock-names = "apb_bridge",
"ahb",
"sec_ctrl_ahb",
"tlmm",
"tlmm_ahb",
"cnoc_ahb",
"mdio_ahb",
"mdio_master_ahb",
"srds0_sys",
"srds1_sys",
"gephy0_sys",
"gephy1_sys",
"gephy2_sys",
"gephy3_sys";
resets = <&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_SRDS0_SYS_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_SRDS1_SYS_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY0_SYS_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY1_SYS_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY2_SYS_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY3_SYS_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY0_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY1_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY2_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_GEPHY3_ARES>,
<&qca8k_nsscc NSS_CC_DSP_ARES>;
reset-names = "srds0_sys",
"srds1_sys",
"gephy0_sys",
"gephy1_sys",
"gephy2_sys",
"gephy3_sys",
"gephy0_soft",
"gephy1_soft",
"gephy2_soft",
"gephy3_soft",
"gephy_dsp";
};
ethernet-phy@1 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-id004d.d180";
reg = <2>;
};
ethernet-phy@2 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-id004d.d180";
reg = <3>;
};
ethernet-phy@3 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-id004d.d180";
reg = <4>;
};
};
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists