netdev - Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_nat: fix action not being set for all ct states

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:10:15 -0500
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Brad Cowie <brad@...cet.nz>,  netdev@...r.kernel.org,
  dev@...nvswitch.org,  fw@...len.de,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  kadlec@...filter.org,  edumazet@...gle.com,
  netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,  kuba@...nel.org,  pabeni@...hat.com,
  davem@...emloft.net,  pablo@...filter.org,  Xin Long
 <lucien.xin@...il.com>,  coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_nat: fix action not being set for all
 ct states

Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> writes:

> + Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
>   Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
>   coreteam@...filter.org
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:43:11AM +1300, Brad Cowie wrote:
>> This fixes openvswitch's handling of nat packets in the related state.
>> 
>> In nf_ct_nat_execute(), which is called from nf_ct_nat(), ICMP/ICMPv6
>> packets in the IP_CT_RELATED or IP_CT_RELATED_REPLY state, which have
>> not been dropped, will follow the goto, however the placement of the
>> goto label means that updating the action bit field will be bypassed.
>> 
>> This causes ovs_nat_update_key() to not be called from ovs_ct_nat()
>> which means the openvswitch match key for the ICMP/ICMPv6 packet is not
>> updated and the pre-nat value will be retained for the key, which will
>> result in the wrong openflow rule being matched for that packet.
>> 
>> Move the goto label above where the action bit field is being set so
>> that it is updated in all cases where the packet is accepted.
>> 
>> Fixes: ebddb1404900 ("net: move the nat function to nf_nat_ovs for ovs and tc")
>> Signed-off-by: Brad Cowie <brad@...cet.nz>
>
> Thanks Brad,
>
> I agree with your analysis and that the problem appears to
> have been introduced by the cited commit.
>
> I am curious to know what use case triggers this /
> why it when unnoticed for a year.
>
> But in any case, this fix looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>
>> ---

LGTM.  I guess we should try to codify the specific flows that were used
to flag this into the ovs selftest - we clearly have a missing case
after NAT lookup.

I'll add it to my (ever growing) list.

Meanwhile,

Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>

>>  net/netfilter/nf_nat_ovs.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_ovs.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_ovs.c
>> index 551abd2da614..0f9a559f6207 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_ovs.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_ovs.c
>> @@ -75,9 +75,10 @@ static int nf_ct_nat_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	err = nf_nat_packet(ct, ctinfo, hooknum, skb);
>> +out:
>>  	if (err == NF_ACCEPT)
>>  		*action |= BIT(maniptype);
>> -out:
>> +
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev@...nvswitch.org
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>> 

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives