[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:16:19 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] bridge tests (was: net-next is OPEN)
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 07:30:25 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:46:23 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > selftests-net/test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh
> > > - fails across all, so must be the OS rather than the "speed"
> >
> > Yes, it's something related to the OS. From the log below:
> >
> > ```
> > COMMAND: ip netns exec h1-n8Aaip ndisc6 -q -r 1 -s 2001:db8:1::1 -w 5000 2001:db8:1::2 eth0.10
> > Raw IPv6 socket: Operation not permitted
> > TEST: ndisc6 [FAIL]
> > rc=1, expected 0
> > ```
> >
> > The test is supposed to be run as root so I'm not sure what this error
> > is about. Do you have something like AppArmor or SELinux running? The
> > program creates an IPv6 raw socket and requires CAP_NET_RAW.
>
> Ah, ugh, sorry for the misdirection, you're right.
Confirmed, with the SUID cleared test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh now
passes on everything with the exception of metal+debug kernel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists